<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blu Ray Screencaps &#8211; Prince Of Thieves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darkrealmfox.com/film_reviews/2010/02/04/blu-ray-screencaps-prince-of-thieves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darkrealmfox.com/film_reviews/2010/02/04/blu-ray-screencaps-prince-of-thieves/</link>
	<description>HD Screencaps/有名人の写真</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4379</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark_Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.darkrealmfox.com/film_reviews/2010/02/04/blu-ray-screencaps-prince-of-thieves/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark_Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkrealmfox.com/film_reviews/?p=1825#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The opening moments after the title sequence in The Silence Of The Lambs just looks far too processed for me, it does improve and while the transfer isn&#039;t a disaster i think they could substantially improve it and i think they will improve it for a future 20th anniversary edition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think Prince Of Thieves is superior as far as presenting the film on disc as it was filmed.&#160; Of course that&#039;s just my opinion but i think this looks like film to me and that&#039;s what i want from my Blu Ray discs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Screencap 5 was added to show that there is some detail in the distance of Costner crossing the stream ( or his body double ) but in the DVD edition he is just a messy blur. The belt around Morgan Freeman has detail on the buckle which is totally missing from the DVD edition.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think any issues people have with this film is due to the way it was filmed and the lenses and film stock used mean it will never look that much better than it does now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I may be proved wrong on that last point and if so i&#039;ll be the first to re-post and admit it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opening moments after the title sequence in The Silence Of The Lambs just looks far too processed for me, it does improve and while the transfer isn&#39;t a disaster i think they could substantially improve it and i think they will improve it for a future 20th anniversary edition.</p>
<p>I think Prince Of Thieves is superior as far as presenting the film on disc as it was filmed.&nbsp; Of course that&#39;s just my opinion but i think this looks like film to me and that&#39;s what i want from my Blu Ray discs.</p>
<p>Screencap 5 was added to show that there is some detail in the distance of Costner crossing the stream ( or his body double ) but in the DVD edition he is just a messy blur. The belt around Morgan Freeman has detail on the buckle which is totally missing from the DVD edition.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I think any issues people have with this film is due to the way it was filmed and the lenses and film stock used mean it will never look that much better than it does now.</p>
<p>I may be proved wrong on that last point and if so i&#39;ll be the first to re-post and admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mackenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.darkrealmfox.com/film_reviews/2010/02/04/blu-ray-screencaps-prince-of-thieves/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mackenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkrealmfox.com/film_reviews/?p=1825#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I must confess I&#039;m slightly surprised you&#039;re championing this transfer when you came down so hard on something like &lt;strong&gt;The Silence of the Lambs&lt;/strong&gt;, which in my opinion is streets ahead of this. It&#039;s clearly not an upconvert but it really doesn&#039;t look all that much better. If indeed it does look substantially better than the DVD, then it must have been one hell of a bad DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess I&#39;m slightly surprised you&#39;re championing this transfer when you came down so hard on something like <strong>The Silence of the Lambs</strong>, which in my opinion is streets ahead of this. It&#39;s clearly not an upconvert but it really doesn&#39;t look all that much better. If indeed it does look substantially better than the DVD, then it must have been one hell of a bad DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
